God Save Wikipedia!
But we quickly move to the stage in "Internet is all there, do not need books or newspapers" or "is written on Wikipedia is true then" to one in which we use and we turn to the Internet while maintaining a high degree of skepticism.
Moreover, hoaxes and false scoops are on the agenda for anyone with a mailbox. And the hoaxes and false
appeals are hard to die.
For example, do you remember the various conspiracy theories on the assassination attempt on the Twin Towers of New York?
I say, after the boom of DVDs and conferences all proven wrong (see here ), one by one, you heard a supporter quanlche say, "Shit, I took that corner"? Not me.
But Wiki is also more difficult.
Anyone can add or edit an entry sentences. For the hottest topics (Israel, 9 / 11, etc.) there is a group of directors that controls before allowing the changes.
But it is not always so, indeed.
See what combines the Antonio Caracciolo, "which qualifies as professor of philosophy of law at the University of Rome La Sapienza and Provincial Coordinator of Forza Italy ( link) and maintains the beauty of 29 blog ( link), most of which are characterized by specific ideological and political positions : antipathy toward Israel, and Hamas sympathies for neo-Nazism, to the revisionists, deniers and conspiracy theorists etc. ... "
is why when I hear" The children are the future of the network "I run the ball.
It 's a nice slogan, but it means nothing, the network is full of fakes and liars incompetent assholes.
Internet is a medium, wonderful and endless applications, but if an on-line news is not to say that is definitely true and just.
0 comments:
Post a Comment